Big Business gets a break on financial reform

WASHINGTON (CNNMoney) -- Big business scored a major win Wednesday when two regulatory boards agreed to limit the impact of tough rules to regulate the complex trades that helped spur the 2008 financial crisis.
Regulators have been struggling for months to figure out who should be included in a new crackdown of swaps or derivatives -- complex financial bets derived from other financial products such as the price of jet fuel or mortgages.

When Congress passed Wall Street reforms in 2010, lawmakers left the big decisions of how to regulate derivatives up to supervising agencies. Generally, the Democratic-controlled Congress wanted swaps to be more transparent and safer.
The two regulatory bodies in charge of derivatives, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, originally suggested that the new rules should target those who trade more than $100 million worth of swaps a year.
But over the past two years, big business, ranging from Wall Street to energy and agricultural companies, have spent millions of dollars lobbying regulators. They wanted the regulators to back off on tougher rules that would require disclosure of the price of a swap as well as capital to back up those bets.
Opponents of tougher rules argued the crackdown would prevent their ability to make bets to hedge against price volatility. Tougher rules also hike the cost of making all financial bets, while shrinking profit margins.
On Wednesday, the CFTC and SEC voted to sharply narrow the pool of companies that must abide by tougher rules. The rule narrowed the definition of who qualifies as a swaps dealer by raising the threshold from a suggested $100 million to $8 billion in swaps traded each year.
In three years, the threshold would broaden and impact those that trade $3 billion in swaps per year.
CFTC officials couldn't say Wednesday how many companies would have to register as swaps dealers when the new rules kick in.
Several veterans of the financial crisis cried foul, calling the new rules far too narrow to have much of an impact. One former CFTC official called the move one of the largest erosions of the Wall Street reforms passed as part of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act.
"It's just breathtaking. How did they get from $100 million to $8 billion? And there are so many exemptions written in there," said Michael Greenberger, a professor at the University of Maryland School of Law who worked at the CFTC during the administration of President Bill Clinton. "It's an administrative veto of Dodd-Frank."
Many companies and Wall Street banks use derivatives to cut the risk that they'll lose money on a deal. Derivatives are also used to lock in the price of a commodity, the way farmers do with the corn they hope to sell after the harvest.
So called end-users were protected from the new rules and won't be required to abide by tougher rules, officials said.
Derivatives played a role in the financial crisis when bets made on the mortgage market failed, in part because many people assumed housing prices -- which surged in the mid-2000s -- would rise indefinitely.
Those bets were made in the shadows, with no public exposure. So when the housing market crumbled and financial firms started failing, nobody knew the value of these bets, exacerbating the crisis


  1. It is an amazing post.Very useful to me.I liked it .Take a look to my blog cash against credit card at low interest.

  2. Great post....Thank you for posting the great content……I found it quiet interesting, hopefully you will keep posting such blogs…
    If you Want more Click this link


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BSkyB hopes results can outshine hacking headlines

Manufacturing sector expands slightly in April supported by bulging order books: HSBC PMI data

Breakout, Pullback, Continuation Pattern